Tag Archives: Citizens of Wildomar

ITS TIME FOR AN INITIATIVE IN WILDOMAR

With the city of wildomar burying the public meetings for “by district” discussion behind regularly scheduled city council meetings, the lack of applicants for a Planning Commission and Measure Z Oversight Committee openings, talk of how overwhelmed city staff is with “Public Records Request” for which they provide no evidence, now is the time for citizens to act.

This initiative should be called the Wildomar Open Governance Act

Transparency

(These initiatives are sometimes know as Sunshine Ordinances or Open Government Ordinances).
In numerous cases they are passed by city councils to appease citizens, the problem being they can also be changed by city councils whenever they wish. If enacted by an initiative on the local ballot they can only be changed by the people.
An example of a city council changing things when they choose can be found at http://calaware.org/awareness-area-government/milpitas-backslides-on-transparency-commitment

The purpose of this initiative is to enact voter approved local legislation to improve transparency in local government and make it easier for people to access city government so that they may be more informed about what their city is doing and so that they may be involved in a more meaningful and knowledgeable way.

The initiative should include the following:

A. Video and Audio Recording of Meetings

1. Each legislative body shall schedule regular and special meetings in a public building accessible with live video streaming capability.

2. The City Council and Planning Commission shall video record each meeting. All other commissions and committees shall audio record each meeting.

3. All meetings of the City Council and Planning Commission shall be live streamed and within one week (5 working days) of the meeting video shall be made available by webcast on the City’s website. Audio recordings should also be made available on the City’s website

4. All recordings shall remain on the City’s website for a period of at least ten (10) years from the meeting.

B. Notice and agenda requirements: Special meetings.
Special meetings of any local body may be called at any time by the presiding officer thereof or by a majority of the members thereof. All local bodies calling a special meeting shall provide notice by:

1. Posting a copy of the agenda in a location freely accessible to the public at least seventy-two (72) hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the meeting set forth in the agenda.

2. Delivering a copy of the agenda and copies of all agenda-related material to each member of the local body, to each local newspaper of general circulation, to each agenda subscriber, and to each media organization which has previously requested notice in writing, so that a copy of the agenda is received at least seventy-two (72) hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the meeting set forth in the agenda. Receipt of the agenda shall be presumed upon reasonable proof that delivery was made

3. In addition to the noticing requirements of this section, post a copy of the agenda for any special meeting on-line at the local body’s website at least seventy-two (72) hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the time of the meeting set forth in the agenda. Failure to timely post a copy of the agenda online because of software or hardware impairment, shall not constitute a defect in the notice for a special meeting if the local body complies with all other posting and noticing requirements.

C. Notice and agenda requirements: Regular meetings
Ten Day Advance Notice Requirement for Regular Meetings of the City Council, Planning Commission, Advisory Committees and Standing Committees shall provide notice before any regular meeting by:

1. Posting a copy of the agenda in a location freely accessible to the public twenty-four (24) hours a day no later than ten (10) days before the date of the meeting.

2. Delivering a copy of the agenda and copies of all agenda-related material to each member of the local body, to each local newspaper of general circulation, to each agenda subscriber, and to each media organization which has previously requested notice in writing, so that a copy of the agenda is received at least ten days (10) before the time of the meeting set forth in the agenda. Receipt of the agenda shall be presumed upon reasonable proof that delivery was made.

3. In addition to the noticing requirements of this section, post a copy of the agenda for any special meeting on-line at the local body’s website at ten days (10) before the time of the meeting set forth in the agenda. Failure to timely post a copy of the agenda online because of software or hardware impairment, shall not constitute a defect in the notice for a special meeting if the local body complies with all other posting and noticing requirements.

D. Meeting Agendas
1. When items are withdrawn from the agenda of a regular or special meeting after posting of the agenda but before the meeting, all paper and electronically posted copies of the agenda shall be amended to state the reason for withdrawal.

2. Supplemental Agenda and Related Materials Requirements for Regular Meetings of the City Council may amend or supplement a posted agenda or agenda-related materials no later than seventy-two (72) hours before a regular meeting and only for the following reasons or under the following conditions:

a. To add an item due to an emergency or urgency, provided the local body makes the same findings before taking action

b. To delete or withdraw any item from a posted agenda; however, nothing herein shall limit the ability of a local body to delete or withdraw an item during the meeting as long as the local body permits members of the public to address the deleted or withdrawn item.

3. Excuse of Sunshine Notice Requirements. If an item appears on an agenda but the local body fails to meet any of the additional notice requirements under this section, the local body may take action only if:

a. The minimum notice requirements of the Brown Act have been met; and,

b. The local body, by a two-thirds vote of those members present, adopts a motion determining that, upon consideration of the facts and circumstances, it was not reasonably possible to meet the additional notice requirements under this section and any one of the following exists:
1. The need to take immediate action on the item is required to avoid a substantial adverse impact that would occur if the action were deferred to a subsequent special or regular meeting;
2. There is a need to take immediate action which relates to federal or state legislation or the local body’s eligibility for any grant or gift; or,
3. The item relates to a purely ceremonial or commendatory action.

E. Neighborhood Notices
A. Any notice that is mailed, posted or published by a City department, board, agency or commission to inform those residing within a 2,500 foot radius of a proposed or planned activity that might impact their property or neighborhood shall be brief, concise and written in plain, easily understood language. The notice shall also state the name and address of the person or persons to whom written comments concerning the notice should be submitted.

B. If mailed notices are returned undelivered, the person designated to receive written comments shall investigate the reason the notice was not delivered and make additional attempts via telephone or email to contact any resident not notified.

Public Notices in General
1. Public notices shall be written in easily understood language without undefined abbreviations or acronyms and give a full description of the subject, applicable regulations, significant consequences of taking action or non-action, when and where the subject will be considered, opportunities for public comment, and where to obtain further information.

F. Mayor’s State of the City Address
If the Mayor delivers a State of the City address, it shall be given in a disabled accessible venue with, audio and video-streaming and transmission capabilities. The event shall be noticed, recorded, free to the public and open to all

G. Public Records: Access Requests and Responses
1. The City shall keep a log of all submitted public records access requests and the responses thereto showing, as a minimum, the date of the request, a brief summary of the request, the date the response was completed and the records were available, an indicator to denote if no records were available, the name of the requester (when furnished), their email address (when furnished) and the staff member(s) responsible for processing the request. Submissions which provide no method of response must still be logged-in but otherwise may be ignored

2. All requests received via any format where an email address was provided shall be sent a return email acknowledgment of the receipt within one (1) business day after the request is received. Reasonable effort shall be exerted to promptly complete requests

3. The City Clerk shall publish in the Consolidated Annual Financial Report (CAFR) the number of public records requests received during that fiscal year, the number of requests where documents were made available, the number of requests where no documents were made available, and the number of requests completed

4. Any withholding of information shall be justified, in writing, within two (2) business days of the day of the request. All withholdings shall cite the justifying legal authority and, where that authority is an exemption from disclosure under the California Public Records Act, the public interest in favor of not disclosing. A withholding on the basis that disclosure would incur civil or criminal liability shall cite any statutory or case law supporting that position.

H. Public Records: Copying Fees
1. No fee shall be charged for copies of documents routinely produced in multiple copies. e.g. Meeting Agendas and packets.

2. Reproduction charges for documents copied to the order of the requester shall not exceed ten (10) cents per page copy charges. If the direct cost of duplication, as defined by case law interpretation of the California Public Records Act, is more than ten cents per page the City shall provide documentation of that.

I. Public Records: City Business
1. Documents which constitute active city agreements/contracts entered into prior to the effective date of the act which exceed $5,000 shall be digitized in response to a public records request or as time is available and published via the internet as the electronic documents become available.
All documents which constitute new agreements/contracts with totals exceeding $5,000 shall be digitized, processed with optical character recognition and published via the internet to facilitate document retrieval.

2. All bills, claims, invoices, vouchers or other records of payment obligations, as well as records of actual disbursements showing the amount paid, the payee and the purpose for which payment is made shall be public records and available to the public.

THIS INITIATIVE MAY NOT BE AMENDED EXCEPT UPON VOTER APPROVAL

This is a work in progress, many Sunshine Ordinances contain some/or all of the following:

Sunshine Reasons

WHAT EVER YOU SAY I CONSENT

Orwell
While researching the documentation that was used to compile the Measure Z audit it became apparent some of the numbers just did not add up.

Going back over voucher list (checks written by the city) one can not help noticing large gaps in the numbering sequence.

These amounts spent were approved by the city council in what is called a consent calendar.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion.
This item isn’t used often, except in specialized organizations such as public legislative bodies or a large professional society’s house of delegates. A consent calendar quickly processes a lot of noncontroversial items that can be disposed of quickly by placing them on a list (the consent calendar) of items to be adopted all at once.

The trouble here is Council members are required to trust that staff has done their job.

As a result of these gaps it became necessary to make a public records request of 79 missing vouchers which were issued during a 18 month period.

The city council might consent to this type of sloppy work but not I. In the future I will be more diligent as should you.

SIDEWALK SUPER an AGE OLD TRADITION

An idea dating back to the depression era which encouraged laymen to observe and offer critique of construction being performed throughout the country.

Super1

Be that as it may, modern contractors do recognize the value of having sidewalk superintendents on their jobs. Observers of construction work have, from time to time, offered worthwhile suggestions as to how difficult operations could be simplified.

Sidewalk superintendents perform an important function in spreading information concerning construction work of vital importance. Many times they build up the morale of workmen on the job who realize that their efforts are being viewed and appreciated.

Super2

Herald Statesman, Mar. 10, 1954. This jokey “Sidewalk Superintendents Club” thing dated to the 1930s, according to a story Jan Morris tells in Manhattan ’45. One day when Rockefeller Center was being built, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. decided to look in on the construction incognito. A foreman on the site saw him, did not recognize him, and ejected him. The incident gave Rockefeller the idea to build a viewer’s platform so that people could watch the construction. It was facetiously presented as a Sidewalk Superintendents Club, and in the very beginning, even had some of the trappings of a club. It was a viewing platform in front of a wall with peepholes, including peepholes close to the ground for future superintendents, children.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88KSY3T-t2w

Super3

A New Idea
Hardly, this is an excerpt from an article from the “Official journal of the Division of Highways,
Department of Public Works, State of California” Volume 31 May-June 1952 Page 17 (link below will take you there)

http://libraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/Californiahighways/chpw_1952_mayjun.pdf

A year ago the Guy F. Atkinson Company, contractor on the $3,500,000 bridge over the Arroyo Seco for the Colorado Freeway, took a big step forward and built a sidewalk superintendents’ house at a vantage point on the job. This building measures 20 feet by 30 feet and has wide windows on all sides so that construction activities can be easily viewed. In the center there is a model of the bridge structure on a scale of 1 inch equals 20 feet so that sidewalk superintendents, after viewing disconnected units of construction out on the site, can look at the model and see how the various parts will fit together in the final product. Mr. Atkinson believes this model is of value not only to sidewalk superintendents but also to his own workmen who frequently come in to look at it in order to more easily interpret the plans. By visualizing the completed structure as shown by the model, they can then work out intricate details of form construction more easily.

KTTV, Channel 11 program “Sidewalk Superintendents,” 25 minutes of program time between 1 and 1.30 p.m. Mondays through Fridays. The first broadcast was made on April 1, 1952 with Resident Engineer Ray Collins being interviewed by Producer Roy Maypole while the camera was showing’ construction scenes on the Hollywood Freeway.

Super5

Come on Wildomar, get out there and supervise away. Fun for all ages.
Super6
Super7

WHAT DROUGHT ?

Posted are two pictures of the same spot in town. It is located on a major roadway. Many would consider it “THE ROADWAY” that defines Wildomar as it runs completely across it from southeast to northwest, spanning tract homes to rural estates, it is sometimes referred to by other names such as the emigrant trail, Old Highway 395, Highway 71, etc.

P11-24-14_11.55

This section of roadway has a modern multi-use trail complete with a fence separating it from the sidewalk (No parkway) sidewalk butted up against a curb of a proposed future 6 lane scenic highway, a planted engineered hillside complete with waterfall.

P03-20-14_09.33

It also has the distinction of being maintained by a landscape company contracted by the city of Wildomar through a Community Service Area (CSA) who’s responsibility it is to clean and weed the trail, maintain the fence in good repair, change out the filters in the storm drain along with reporting to the city public works department anything that may be in need of repair not in their contract all paid for with your tax dollar.
The difference between the two pictures in ONE MONTH AND A DAY.

P12-25-14_09.50

This water leak has saturated one side of the trail and spilled across the sidewalk into a storm drain for a least that long.
This trail is used daily by walkers, joggers, horseback riders (a evidenced by the occasional clue left behind, from the behind)and for over a month not one call has been placed to the city officials or the water district by a resident or the landscaping company contracted to do so.

Notice the fence in need of repair. Hope there is not a fire as it appears this hydrant is the culprit of the leak.

Notice the fence in need of repair. Hope there is not a fire as it appears this hydrant is the culprit of the leak.

Just maybe everyone is waiting to make the news when this vital roadway disappears into a giant sinkhole.

Is this the future

Is this the future

I guess as a resident living several miles from this section of road it will be up to me to report this water leak in time of a drought. (Why haven’t I done so as of yet, call it an experiment). If the leak had been larger I might have.
Interesting addition if one googles this spot it shows a picture from June 2014 where the wetness can be observed.